<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right to Healthcare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.derekmooney.com/2008/04/right-to-healthcare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.derekmooney.com/2008/04/right-to-healthcare/</link>
	<description>derekmooney.com</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 19:25:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Ardell</title>
		<link>http://www.derekmooney.com/2008/04/right-to-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Ardell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=194#comment-155</guid>
		<description>Why do we have this entitlement mentality?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...because we&#039;re not a republic anymore.  The founders knew that if the people can vote themselves power (or money) thy will do so, yet we continue to move toward a pure democracy and away from a republic.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Lots of folks don&#039;t understand why we have the electoral college, for instance.  To them it makes no sense that a candidate could lose the popular election but still win the presidency.  But this was a safeguard put in place to ensure that the mob didn&#039;t get too close to government decisions.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Individuals are capable of acting intelligently, but the masses will always be stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do we have this entitlement mentality?</p>
<p>&#8230;because we&#8217;re not a republic anymore.  The founders knew that if the people can vote themselves power (or money) thy will do so, yet we continue to move toward a pure democracy and away from a republic.</p>
<p>Lots of folks don&#8217;t understand why we have the electoral college, for instance.  To them it makes no sense that a candidate could lose the popular election but still win the presidency.  But this was a safeguard put in place to ensure that the mob didn&#8217;t get too close to government decisions.</p>
<p>Individuals are capable of acting intelligently, but the masses will always be stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://www.derekmooney.com/2008/04/right-to-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 13:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=194#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Thanks for dropping by.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;m not dreaming about the church taking care of the poor and the sick.  This was a reality until the government decided to step into charity and take a secular approach.  The more the government stepped in to provide charity that did not (and could not) discriminate between those who were truly needy and those who were not, it encouraged an entitlement mentality and pushed people further into pauperism.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;I&#039;ve got a lot more to say about this, but it should really wait for another post.  The point is, it&#039;s not a dream.  When free from government competition, private charity is more than able to handle those in need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for dropping by.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not dreaming about the church taking care of the poor and the sick.  This was a reality until the government decided to step into charity and take a secular approach.  The more the government stepped in to provide charity that did not (and could not) discriminate between those who were truly needy and those who were not, it encouraged an entitlement mentality and pushed people further into pauperism.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a lot more to say about this, but it should really wait for another post.  The point is, it&#8217;s not a dream.  When free from government competition, private charity is more than able to handle those in need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrPages</title>
		<link>http://www.derekmooney.com/2008/04/right-to-healthcare/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>MrPages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 21:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/?p=194#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Definitely an opinion held by someone who has not had to deal with a quarter million dollars in medical bills for a sick child while earning minimum wage.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A &quot;right&quot;?  Perhaps not.  and if Christians were doing their jobs properly, would it be necessary that the government provide health care?  Nope.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But as long as you&#039;re dreaming, can I have a pony?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely an opinion held by someone who has not had to deal with a quarter million dollars in medical bills for a sick child while earning minimum wage.</p>
<p>A &#8220;right&#8221;?  Perhaps not.  and if Christians were doing their jobs properly, would it be necessary that the government provide health care?  Nope.</p>
<p>But as long as you&#8217;re dreaming, can I have a pony?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
